Guides / For Shops
Marketplace, Matching Service or Direct Sales: What Each Does to a Shop
A machine shop with idle capacity gets the same pitch from three directions, and the three are not the same thing at all. Here is what each actually does to a shop over three years.
The three models
| Marketplace | Matching service | Direct sales | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Who sets the price to the buyer | The platform | You | You |
| Who owns the customer | The platform | You | You |
| Do you know who the buyer is | Often not | Yes | Yes |
| Cost to you | A share of every job | Per lead | Your time |
| Effort per job | Very low | Low | High |
| Volume available | High | Limited | Whatever you build |
| What it builds over time | The platform’s brand | Your customer list | Your customer list |
Nobody should be surprised that a site that runs a matching service puts matching in the middle column. Read the honest downsides below before you weigh that.
What a marketplace is actually good at
Not everything about this model is a trap. There are shops for which it is the right answer.
Filling a hole in the schedule. A machine that is idle next week earns nothing. Marketplace work at a thin margin beats an empty spindle, and it arrives without a sales cycle.
Smoothing a seasonal book. Shops with lumpy demand use it as ballast.
Learning what the market pays. After twenty marketplace jobs you have a much better sense of where your real cost sits relative to everyone else’s price.
Getting started. A new shop with no reputation and no referrals has to get parts through the door somehow.
What it costs beyond the margin
Price anchoring. This is the cost shops underestimate. Once you have produced a part at the platform’s number, that number is in your head and increasingly in the market’s. Charging your own rate for similar work afterwards is harder than it was before.
No relationship to compound. In direct work, the fifth order from a customer is more profitable than the first, because programming exists, fixtures exist and trust exists. Marketplace work often resets each time, and if the platform routes the next order elsewhere you never find out.
Your reputation accrues to somebody else. Three years of on-time delivery and zero rejects builds the platform’s promise to buyers. A buyer who was delighted usually cannot name you.
Concentration risk. A shop where a platform is most of the revenue has a single customer with total leverage over pricing and volume, and no contract that protects it.
The honest case against a matching service too
Since we run one, here is where it does not help.
It is not free. You pay per lead. Referrals cost nothing and close better. If your referral pipeline fills your machines, buy nothing from anyone.
Volume is capped. A specialist service in one metal cannot send you the flow a general marketplace can. It is a supplement, not a pipeline.
You still have to win the quote. An introduction is a seat at the table. Your quote, your questions and your response time decide the rest.
There is no guaranteed order. Each request goes to a small number of shops. A short list is still a list.
It is only as good as the screening. If a matching service is not actually reading the drawings, you are paying for a directory. Ask how the shortlist is built before you pay for anything. Ours is published on the how we match page, and you should expect the same from any service that wants your money.
How to decide
Three questions, in order.
1. What problem are you solving this quarter? Idle capacity now points to a marketplace. Wrong kind of work points to better targeting, which means matching or direct. No pipeline at all points to all three plus a website.
2. What share of capacity are you willing to give up control over? Pick a number before you sign up, twenty or thirty percent, and hold it. The shops that get into trouble are the ones that never set the cap.
3. What do you want to own in three years? If the answer is a book of customers who ask for you by name, then every channel needs to be judged on whether it builds that or borrows against it.
A sensible mix for a titanium shop
| Share of capacity | Source | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| 40 to 60 percent | Repeat and referral | The base. Highest margin, lowest cost |
| 20 to 30 percent | Direct enquiries from your own site and approvals | The asset you are building |
| 10 to 20 percent | Matching services | Targeted fill, and new customers you keep |
| 0 to 20 percent | Marketplace | Ballast. Capped deliberately |
The exact numbers matter less than the fact that somebody chose them. A shop that has never decided its mix has one chosen for it by whoever emails last.
If titanium is a real capability
We introduce titanium RFQs to shops cutting the grade in question now. Preview before you pay, buyer contact when you take it, no commission on the order, and the customer is yours afterwards.
Register your shop or compare all six lead sources first.
Frequently asked questions
Do manufacturing marketplaces pay well?
They pay predictably rather than well. The platform prices the part to the buyer and keeps the difference, so your margin is set by their algorithm rather than by your own quoting. For filling idle capacity that trade is often worth it. As a shop's main income it is fragile.
Can a shop use a marketplace and still build its own customers?
Yes, as long as it is deliberate. The failure mode is drift: a shop takes marketplace work because it is easy, stops quoting direct, and three years later has no book of its own. Cap the share of capacity you allocate to it and hold the cap.
What is the difference between a marketplace and a matching service?
A marketplace stands between you and the buyer, prices the job and usually keeps the customer anonymous. A matching service introduces you and steps out, so you quote directly and own the relationship. The first is a customer, the second is a lead source.
Need a quote for this part?
Send the drawing. We match you with up to 3 titanium shops and reply within 24 business hours.
Get matched with a titanium shop